Tag Archives: skeptic

How to create a new religion

April 26, 2011

I read here (about scientology) (interesting comments by the way) :

I went to Art Center College of Design, where Ray Bradbury was on the board. He was a taciturn fellow, but recounted a story that I don’t know if it’s true or not, but basically he said Scientology was started on a dare.

That’s right; A DARE.

He said he and his contemporary sci-fi writer, L Ron Hubbard were discussing how religion is an obsolete human need, that science was taking its place, and that people didn’t need to believe in things like that anymore and that there could not be any new religions because humanity was past it. All religions are old religions (or factions thereof, like Mormonism via Christianity)

Well apparently L Ron bet him that he could create a new religion and wrote Dianetics, then created Scientology. It became so lucrative that essentially he went crazy, did in fact dodge taxes to the extent where he was living on a boat in international waters for the remainder of this life.

Bradbury was none to pleased about losing the bet.

So… I am like Bradbury. I can’t believe people would fall for it and I have the strange hope that science is prevailing. Still … this guy managed to create a new religion. “unbelievable but true”.  However… when I would live in 0 BC I probably would think the same. Heck, when I would live 2500 BCE I probably would be of the opinion that “we now live in a age where, after Imhotep, people probably won’t fall anymore for cults, religions and related anymore”… When I would live 5000 years BCE in Byblos I would probably think “well… we now live in  a civilized age where noone is really going to believe that our current dictator is actually a God…” (where he became THE god)…. (OMG!).

I saw an interview with James Randi on the Tros TV Show lately who debunked so many frauds like Uri Geller, James Hydrick, Joao de Deus, Allison DeBois (from the tv series Medium…) and so on and so on.. but most of them still make a lot of money. So no matter what happens the shows goes on. So why? How in the hell do these people actually get zillions of people giving them money?

And that is the real question. I read this course which gives some examples. And there are millions of sites who explains the nonsense of basically every fraud, from Nostradamus to organized religions to ufo-crazies to conspiracy-crazies and zillions of cults. But… the audience seems to be growing instead of the other way around.

I notice this also on my blog. Whenever I post something about “a strange thing” that article just get a lot of hits (see e.g. “is putin the anti-christ”). Somehow there are LOADS of people just surfing for these kinds of things. I just “did something funny” with an image, some mysterious text copy and pasted and wammo, shitloads of visitors. Science article? 4 visitors! “Bush Killed Kennedy” thousands of visitors!

Notice YouTube: just post something with UFO, no matter if it has been debunked a zillion times, mumble something as “conspiracy from people in your class who got better grades and got a science job instead of janitor…” and wammo 10.000.000 visitors all commenting on how mysterious our world is…………

Acupuncture is a good ‘case’. After so many years and so many researches they all basically say “nonsense”. But what happens? Nothing. People make still a gazillion dollars in the acupuncture industry.

So… I think that is the real problem to crack. I don’t think discussions with religious people, cult people, religion 2.0 people, paranormal xxx believers, conspiracy believers and so on are of any use. Maybe you can drop some interesting points but its to no avail. The feedback is mostly “fuzzy”, as in “you should not think”….. or “there is more between heaven and earth”.

And all in all “my group” is only a teeny weeny teeny weeny little percentage of the people on earth. A  mega minority.

So … what is the problem here? Is it the absence of critical thinking classes in our education system? Could that be it? That critical thinking classes are only part of (some) university educations? 

I really want to solve this problem, it’s an interesting one. Or actually… I want you to solve it.

The Earth is Growing!

March 18, 2009

It’s an interesting theory, though basically abandoned by the largest percentage of scientists.

read the comments to read more (Alle 49452 reacties bekijken)

also: http://www.expanding-earth.org/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth_theory

Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neal_Adams

imageAlthough this is the leading theory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea , if the continents really fit together perfectly …. well…. read the wikipedia page for more info:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth_theory

Apart from not much scientific support (which is not like 0% for para or pseudo science or santa claus) it looks so logical that I think it is  worth to put more research on it. (but I must admit that I do not completely understand all the discussions in the comments on it).

I also don’t like the “conspiracy of” thing, Many of the remaining expanding Earth adherents are proponents of the ideas of the late Australian geologist S. Warren Carey, whose ideas were popular for a time in the 1950s and 60s.

Who killed John Lennon? George Bush Sr.

December 28, 2008

 

I recently saw the movie on George Bush Sr. and now I see another “story” (here) with other links to George Bush. So what do the skeptic society think on all these theories? They do seem to contain some very valid material.

He was not only involved with both commercial (oil) operations and non commercial (world vision) operations, cuba, directly involved with the killing on president Kennedy  by Cuban CIA veterans and now…. also directly involved with the attempt murder on Reagan………….

What kind of person is that? What is going on?

 

image image

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley_Jr.  (shot Reagan)

"The family of the man charged with trying to assassinate President Reagan is acquainted with the family of Vice-President George Bush and had made large contributions to his political campaign … Scott Hinckley, brother of John W. Hinckley Jr. was to have dined tonight in Denver at the home of Neil Bush, one of the Vice-President’s sons … The Houston Post said it was unable to reach Scott Hinckley, vice-president of his father’s Denver-based firm, Vanderbilt Energy Corporation, for comment. Neil Bush lives in Denver, where he works for Standard Oil Company of Indiana. In 1978, Neil Bush served as campaign manager for his brother, George W. Bush, the Vice-President’s eldest son, who made an unsuccessful bid for Congress. Neil lived in Lubbock, Texas, throughout much of 1978, where John Hinckley lived from 1974 through 1980."

Heel veel mensen hebben een boekenbon gekregen

December 28, 2008

Ik ga dus op 28 december naar de selexyz site, en kom op een bedrag NET onder de 20 euro die op mijn boekenbon staat:

 Wat een Onzin! (H. de Regt & Dooremalen, H.)imageHet bovennatuurlijke is in. Mediums, paragnosten, homeopaten, je kunt tegenwoordig niet meer om ze heen. Herman de Regt en Hans Dooremalen onderwierpen diverse van deze modeverschijnselen aan een grondig onderzoek en schreven er een aanstekelijk boek over. Hun conclusie is ondubbelzinnig: wat een onzin! Onze fascinatie voor het bovennatuurlijke blijkt niet onschuldig. In Wat een onzin! komt een bonte stoet voorbij van bijna-doodervaringsdeskundigen en zelfverklaarde heksen. De wetenschap staat steeds meer onder druk; we kunnen blijkbaar niet goed leven in een wereld zonder toverij. Toch is juist de wetenschap het instrument dat ons moet beschermen tegen de onzinnige claims en praktijken van hen die geloven in het bovennatuurlijke.” (250 pagina’s, € 18,95)

(ook te bestellen bij boek.net, central point, AKOKnowington, BOL, etc…) maar…. :

image

Dan maar even wachten tot de na-solstice periode voorbij is….

Link

The Kennedy-Nixon-Bush Connection
A newly discovered FBI document reveals that George Bush was directly involved in the 1963 murder of President John Kennedy. The document places Bush working with the now-famous CIA agent, Felix Rodriguez, recruiting right-wing Cuban exiles for the invasion of Cuba. It was Bush’s CIA job to organize the Cuban community in Miami for the invasion. The Cubans were trained as marksmen by the CIA. Bush at that time lived in Texas. Hopping from Houston to Miami weekly, Bush spent 1960 and ’61 recruiting Cubans in Miami for the invasion. That is how he met Felix Rodriguez.

The New Revisionism: Would We be Better Off if Hitler Had Won?

December 14, 2008

image

SKEPTIC ISSUE DECEMBER 2008:

The New Revisionism:

Would We be Better Off

if Hitler Had Won?

Out-of-Body & Near Death Experiences; The Machine-like Image of the Flagellum: Intelligent Design or Graphic Design?; Whatever Happened to Stephen Wolfram’s New Science; What Twins Tell us about Genes & Environment; Altruism Controversy: Did It Evolve?…

I am on the verge of subscribing to Skeptic Magazine more or less because of Junior Skeptic which is great for Maarten!

The Skeptics Society is a nonprofit, member-supported organization devoted to promoting scientific skepticism and resisting the spread of pseudoscience, superstition, and irrational beliefs. The Skeptics Society was originally founded as a Los Angeles-area skeptical group to replace the defunct Southern California Skeptics. After the success of its magazine, Skeptic, introduced in Spring 1992, it became a national — then international — organization.

It now has 55.000 members including including Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” Saturday Night Live alumnus Julia Sweeney, biologist Richard Dawkins and popular astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson.

When investigating extraordinary claims, the Skeptics Society adopts the view of the 17th Century Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza:

“I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them.”

With regard to the procedure by which such claims are investigated, the Society uses the scientific method developed in the 16th and 17th Century, which the Society believes adheres to Albert Einstein’s philosophy:

“All our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike—and yet it is the most precious thing we have.”

The Skeptics Society contends that whereas some may perceive skeptics to be cynics or curmudgeons who reject all new ideas that may challenge the status quo on an a priori basis, skepticism is actually a provisional approach to claims. The Society contends that skepticism is merely the application of reason and the acknowledgement of the need for evidence for any and all ideas, even “sacred cows”, and that it is merely a method, and not a position. The Skeptics Society contends that skepticism has a long historical tradition dating back to Socrates’ observation, “All I know is that I know nothing”, and that its modern embodiment is the scientific method, which involves gathering data to formulate and test explanations for natural phenomena and other claims. A claim, according to this view, becomes factual when it is confirmed to a rigorous extent, but that all facts remain provisional and subject to challenge, because the ongoing accumulation of knowledge may one day yield information that requires revision, correction, or even abandonment of the prevailing model.

123...»»